![]() When the early access model was announced, they justified it by promising to deliver the greatly improved foundation on which all the new features were going to be built. The fact that it runs absolutely horrible and, outside of UI and vehicle parts, looks barely any better than modded KSP 1 makes it really hard to believe that some of those promised features are ever going to make it into this game. After a three year delay, a downgraded version of KSP 1 that is missing pretty much all advertised features is all you have to show? While I agree that the game can’t be judged as finished product yet, this footage has pretty much completely eroded my trust that this finished product is ever going to exist in the first place. I know the whole „early access“ label makes the current state of the game pretty much immune to criticism to a lot of people. But it doesn't even run properly on a massive rig when not even stressing the game limits. I happily wait 6 more months if they can actually make the game run on a common rig. This game will get so many negative reviews and low sales. But they should absolutely not EA release that game with that performance. All the other stuff like parts and improved textures/terrain is stuff I can see come down the line of EA. My biggest gripe is definitely the performance. I hope the devs get on the feedback they are receiving quick I got a decent rig but seeing these massive rigs struggle for basic rockets there is pretty much no point in getting this game at this stage. But now I think I am gonna wait this one out a bit. This was a day one buy for me, as I got some money left I wanted to splash on some games. ![]() But seems a lot of KSP 1 non DLC parts are missing, no temperature or re-entry modelling. I initially thought only career and science were going to be missing (and robotic parts was a guess). When I saw the spec release I was like ''That's quite bad, but might not be horrible''. All the footage is full of jagged edges so I assuming antialiasing (which is quite the performance drain often) isn't even enabled.I've seen a video of a simple 150 part rocket getting 20 fps (checked with frame counter) mid atmosphere flight on a beefy 4080. And I don't see much that justifies it at all. Performance speaks for itself, it's horrible. Matt's Mun landing just shows how bad some parts of the game look. Others look terrible like the ground textures. Some stuff looks good like the new kerbals, parts, atmosphere and clouds (not as good as Blackrack's but kinda like the more toony style imo), rocket plumes, vfx. Great potential but definitely not worth £50. Also still bounces when landing on Mun.Īs Scott Manley suggested: Stick to KSP 1 with mods for now. Still has the KSP 1 wobbling/extreme flexing of rockets. Heavy amounts of lag for even mid size rockets (and this is on high end PCs) Planet details (textures, rocks, etc) do not look a lot better than KSP 1, and a lot worse than Parrallax 2. The sun coming up/down when in orbit looks good ![]() Its Unity so there's still a possibility for mods but don't set any expectations. There is currently no thermal/heat modeled in game.Ĭan't right click on targets to pin distance, neither in gameplay or mapĪ lot of KSP 1 DLC stuff seems to be missing (robotics and such) Missing KSP 1 features: (in addition to what has been said before) SYSTEM SPECS for this gameplay: (according to Matt Lowne)Įdit: graphics settings from Everyday Astronaut's video. Hugo Lisoir: J'ai TESTÉ KERBAL SPACE PROGRAM 2 en avant première ! (in French) Reid Captain: I Played Kerbal Space Program 2: Is It Even Ready For Launch? ObsidianAnt: Kerbal Space Program 2 - HANDS ON GAMEPLAY - First LookĮveryday Astronaut: Full Review and Gameplay! The good, the bad, and the broken!īilly Winn Jr: HANDS ON KSP 2 | Kerbal Space Program 2 Matt Lowne: KSP 2: APOLLO STYLE MUN MISSION! Scott Manley: Kerbal Space Program 2 - First Impacts - Early Access Release Send us a message with proof, and we'll give you some flair to show it! Disable header animation Enable header animation Δ | Support/bug reports | KerbalAcademy | ConsoleKSP Last contest's winner: forteefly1998! Have you developed a mod? See this page for more infoĬommunity Teamspeak Server Refrain from submitting images that involve real life space disasters that resulted in loss of lifeĭon't post/discuss mirrors or torrents of any version of KSP ![]() See the discussion on misc posts for more info No posts unrelated to KSP or memes and image macros. Please remain kind and civil at all times ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |